On Writing Sermons

For no reason other than curiosity, I recently went back to some of my notes from seminary on sermon-writing. The notes that were most interesting to me were not those from my preaching classes, but those from a class called “Advanced Biblical Exegesis.” At RTS1, it’s kind of a hodgepodge class for third-year students that covers a random assortment of topics. In Charlotte (in the mid-2000s) it was co-taught by Drs. Bob Cara2 and Dick Belcher.

I’m posting this because I realized in reading the notes how much better my preaching would be if I’d follow this more intentionally. It’s also not a bad standard to use for evaluating the preaching you’re under each week. (Do so with humility and grace, please.) It could also be very helpful to anyone out there who ever needs to write a sermon and doesn’t really know where to begin.

Pre-work: Determine the text, the circle of meaning3, and what within that circle you are going to emphasize. Even if the sermon will be topical, start with a text.

Sermon Outline

  • Introduction
    • Present a modern existential problem4 or interesting intellectual question5 that is neither obvious nor so generic as to be useless.
    • Give a brief introduction to the text so that the congregation has some idea of what it’s about when you read it to them.
      • Historical background – who is the audience and what is their situation
      • Literary background – what has happened prior to this point in the book6
      • Logical progression – how is this text organized or where it falls in broader organization
    • Read the text. How you read it should give the flow and emotional tenor of the passage.
  • Exegesis7
    • Progress through the text, using the logical progression to break it into sections, and making exegetical comments and explanations along the way.
    • Get “top of mind” problems out of the way quickly. Do not let potential problems (absolutes, contradictions, etc.) become a distraction to hearers because you ignore or put them off.
    • Give a detailed exegesis of the original meaning – how your main sermon point connects to the text. This is the whole ballgame. If you don’t prove that the authority for the original meaning is from God in the text itself, your modern application doesn’t have a chance. Bring in other sections of Scripture, as needed, to expand the point that you are making from this text.
  • Application8
    • Focus on the modern meaning and theologize on the implications of the exegesis section.
    • Go through several modern examples to show how the text applies to them. Use “think, feel, do” and apply this to various categories of people and situations.
    • In general, make up real-life situations instead of using illustrations.9
  • Conclusion
    • Bring back the initial problem and give, what is now, the obvious Scriptural solution.

Personal Note

I think the outline above is a great way to organize a sermon as it’s being written. If you write it that way and preach it “as-is,” you’ll be fine.

There is an opportunity however to get a bit next-level with the outline on your final draft. Instead of making Exegesis and Application discrete sections offered in serial, figure out how to weave them together in parallel. I’ve found (on the rare occasions I can do it well) that it helps your listeners to stay engaged throughout rather than dropping in and out.

  1. Reformed Theological Seminary ↩︎
  2. The notes below are almost entirely ripped off from one of Dr. Cara’s lectures. ↩︎
  3. what the text means is not a ‘dot’ but a circle ↩︎
  4. why aren’t I more joyful ↩︎
  5. how does God as creator impact our environmental views ↩︎
  6. what’s its overall purpose? ↩︎
  7. this section should be shorter than you think ↩︎
  8. this section should be longer than you think ↩︎
  9. When you do use illustrations, they should be short, memorable, and obviously connected to an important point. ↩︎

Trump is Not a Good Candidate: A Response to Wayne Grudem

Making the rounds in several of my circles this week is Wayne Grudem’s recent article “Why Voting for Donald Trump is a Morally Good Choice.” I don’t know Dr. Grudem, but I know his theological work well and believe him to be a great servant of God and a wise, Biblical thinker. His opinion on this year’s presidential election is one I’ve heard from others over the last six months, but I find myself disagreeing with it strongly enough to offer an alternative point of view.

Continue reading

Scalia Would Want Obama to Nominate His Replacement

As an amateur Supreme Court watcher and a constitutional originalist, the death of Justice Scalia has me thinking a lot this week about the state of American politics. I read each of the court’s opinions, and frequently SCOTUSBlog also, and have come to know a bit about each of the justices over the past few years. While a controversial one, I’ve found Scalia to operate within a pretty predictable and consistent interpretive perspective over the years. Like any enthusiastic, potentially delusional, amateur, this leads me to believe that I understand how he would have felt about the political Sturm und Drang around choosing his successor.

I think Scalia would have wanted Obama to nominate his replacement and for the Senate to vet, debate, and vote on that candidate.
Continue reading

Conforming Our Affections

Why were all of Jesus’ thoughts and actions pleasing to God while so many of ours are not? How is it that Jesus’ emotional outbursts were always appropriate and mine frequently involve sin? Scripture commands us to “walk as he walked,” to “be imitators” of him, and to have our minds conformed to his – but where do we even start?

The answer, Scripture teaches, is with our affections. Learning to love what he loves and learning to hate what he hates is the starting point for having thoughts, words and even emotions that are pleasing to God. This semester I’ll be teaching a class considering what happens in a Christian life when we begin to act out of love for God, others, and justice rather than love for self, comfort, and stuff. We’ll also talk a great deal about hate: what we should hate, why we should hate, and how that hate should be expressed.

The audio is available here: http://soundwords.us/library/conform-affections/
And the Podcast feed is: http://soundwords.us/library/conform-affections/all.rss

Yeah but who *could* you vote for?

Being an opinionated, type-A personality, I end up in a lot of political discussions. I spend a lot of time reading and thinking about politics and usually find in these discussions that none of that preparation matters – my unpopular views are dismissed as irrelevant.

Recently, the common accusation is: “You’re looking for the perfect candidate. S/He doesn’t exist. No one can measure up to your standards.” Wondering if that was true, my friend Steven and I took the time to identify the issues that seem most important to us and to read everything we could find from what the five Republican candidates (who have a chance) believe about each.

One important note here is about the “Foreign Policy” category. We believe that foreign policy is inextricably linked to fiscal policy. One of the biggest problems with our military strategy is that we never consider the cost of it. If we were to rank these candidates on foreign policy with that principle in mind, they’d all fail. Instead, we agreed to consider foreign policy as if we lived in a world where these decisions had no economic impact. Our scoring system is simple: every issue is either a net positive (+1), neutral (0), or negative (-1).

Continue reading

Sound Words

For quite a while I’ve been annoyed with the state of theological audio content on the internet. It lives in silos, is difficult to browse and search, and is often presented with very user-unfriendly restrictions.1 Further, most of the time no one has gone to the effort to separate the wheat from the chaff – or at least the true from the false.2 As a producer and publisher of audio content, including on this site, it’s also far more difficult than it ought to be to get the content online.

Today I launch my tiny, pebble into the pond, attempt to fix that: Sound Words. Admittedly a bit narcissistic from the start,3 the goal is for this audio library to grow over time into something that is browse-able, searchable and useful. Right now you’re able to search by series and by book of the Bible. In the coming weeks we will add keywords as well. Many thanks to Letterblock for building our CMS and, I have no doubt, charging far less than it’s worth.

  1. I’m looking at you Sermon Audio. ↩︎
  2. Looking at you again, Sermon Audio. ↩︎
  3. It’s not my fault the majority of the content I have access to out of the gate is, well, mine. ↩︎

How I Can Still Admire Robert E. Lee

While there were many shootings in the city of Charleston, SC in 2015, only one will be forever known as the “Charleston Massacre.1” An event this horrific, an act this vile, leaves most of us feeling helpless to respond in any meaningful way. That urge to do something -anything- is understandable after national tragedies. It also often leads us to overreact and do things that satisfy this urge but have negative long-term consequences2.

One of the voices leading the charge for the “we must do something” movement is Comedy Central’s daily news anchor, Jon Stewart. The “something” he suggests is the nationwide removal of all Confederate flags, streets named for Confederate soldiers, and Civil War memorials honoring the Confederate dead. Several segments of his nightly broadcasts have gone viral as viewers excitedly favorite and retweet his monologues. His central thesis seems to be:

I. Every supporter of the Confederate States was, directly or indirectly, supporting treason and slavery.
II. The evils of treason and slavery outweigh any good in or done by those people.
III. People who supported the Confederate States should not be honored in any public way.
IV. People who support or honor those who supported the Confederate States are morally bankrupt, sadly ignorant, or themselves racists.

Continue reading

The Sound of Music Live & What It Says About Us

TV and social network streams have spent the last 24 hours buzzing about last night’s live performance of The Sound of Music. I watched nearly all of it and monitored the Twitter reaction for about the first hour or so.  What struck me from last night’s performance has less to do with production mechanics and more to do with what the audience’s reactions reveal about American culture.

This post got a little long, so I’ll summarize my main points to help you decide if you want to read it: 1) Harsh responses to mistakes discourage people from taking risks; 2) We shouldn’t be so obsessed with perfection; and 3) We should want good for, and from, others. I don’t believe I’m breaking any new ground here, but some things are worth repeating.

Continue reading

Winds of Change

May 1, 2013 will be my last day as pastor of Covenant of Grace. What started as “wondering” only a few months ago has turned in to an extended break from pastoral ministry, a move to Atlanta, and my accepting a position with a start-up division of an established tech company. It’s a lot to share, but I’ll be brief. Continue reading

“Culture of Death” Isn’t Quite Accurate

My news feed the last several mornings has chronicled the ups-and-downs of the “Arkansas Human Heartbeat Protection Act.” Passed by the state’s senate and house, the bill was promptly vetoed by governor Mike Beebe. He explains his decision to veto this way:

“Because it would impose a ban on a woman’s right to choose an elective, nontherapeutic abortion well before viability, Senate Bill 134 blatantly contradicts the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the Supreme Court. When I was sworn in as governor I took an oath to preserve, protect and defend both the Arkansas Constitution and the Constitution of the United States. I take that oath seriously.”

Continue reading